9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Whether books valued at Rs. 5,324, allowed as revenue expenditure, qualify as 'plant' for development rebate under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of books valued at Rs. 5,324 for development rebate under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the claim for development rebate, stating that the books were not directly and wholly used for the business. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed, ruling that books fell within the definition of "plant" under section 43(3) of the Act and allowed the development rebate. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that books are considered "plant" under section 32 of the Act if used for business purposes. The court referred to section 32, which allows deductions for depreciation on assets like machinery, plant, or furniture used for business, subject to certain provisions. The court further analyzed the definition of "plant" under section 43(3), which includes items like books used for business purposes. Referring to the case law, the court highlighted the broad interpretation of the term "plant," emphasizing that it encompasses items like books that serve as tools in the taxpayer's trade. The court cited previous judgments, such as CIT v. Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd., affirming that books qualify as "plant" if they fulfill the functional characteristics of aiding in the business or profession. The Supreme Court also upheld this interpretation in the case of Scientific Engg. House P. Ltd. v. CIT, endorsing the view that items like drawings and business charts constitute "plant" under section 43(3). Based on the legal precedents and the inclusive definition of "plant" in section 43(3) of the Act, the court concluded that books are eligible for development rebate. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the development rebate on the books valued at Rs. 5,324. The judgment affirmed the Tribunal's decision and held that the books qualified as "plant" for the purpose of claiming development rebate under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
