Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2012 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (8) TMI 816 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Liability to pay service tax on services provided by the appellant company to its members under the category of club or association services.
2. Interpretation of the definition of "club or association" under the Finance Act, 1994.
3. Applicability of exemption under Section 145 of the Finance Act, 2012 to the appellant company.
4. Determination of whether the appellant company, being a limited company, is covered under the exemption available to associations.

Analysis:
1. The appellant company, formed for operating a Common Effluent Treatment Plant, was held liable to pay service tax on services provided to its members. The demand was based on the premise that the company, as an association of industrial units, collected fees from members for operating the treatment facility. A demand of Rs. 3,26,39,335/- was confirmed, along with penalties, under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

2. The definition of "club or association" under Clause (25a) of Section-65 of the Finance Act, 1994 was crucial in determining the liability for service tax. The definition excludes bodies established by law, trade unions, and entities engaged in public service. The appellant argued that the exemption under Section 145 of the Finance Act, 2012 applied to them, while the Revenue contended that only clubs or associations, not limited companies, were covered.

3. The Tribunal considered the retrospective exemption provided by Section 145 of the Finance Act, 2012, which exempted services related to common facilities for effluent treatment. Notifications issued exempted club or association services for effluent treatment, with retrospective effect from June 2005. The Tribunal found that the appellant fell within the scope of this exemption, thereby setting aside the demand and penalties.

4. The debate centered on whether the appellant, registered under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, could be considered an association for the purpose of the exemption. The appellant's registration as a company under Section 25, without the term "limited," was argued to maintain their association status. The Tribunal held that the appellant, being an association for service tax liability, was eligible for the exemption, regardless of its corporate structure. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the demand for service tax and penalties were set aside.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates