Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2012 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (9) TMI 703 - AT - Service Tax


Issues: Service Tax Demand, Penalty Reduction, Appropriation of Deposited Amount, Penalty Sections, Pre-deposit Requirement

Service Tax Demand:
The appellant faced a Service Tax demand of Rs. 10,83,975 following the first appellate order. The appellant had already deposited Rs. 12,14,786 during the appeal. The appellant sought a concession in penalty, proposing a reduction to 25% of the service tax demand to conclude the litigation. The Tribunal acknowledged the partial relief granted by the first appellate authority and examined the gravity of penal consequences in the case. The Tribunal directed the appropriation of the deposited amount towards the undisputed service tax and the balance towards a penalty of 25% of the service tax demand.

Penalty Reduction:
The Tribunal considered the appellant's request for a penalty reduction and found that the first appellate authority did not clearly highlight the questionable conduct of the appellant. As a result, the Tribunal decided to appropriate the deposited amount towards the service tax and impose a penalty of 25% of the service tax demand. The Tribunal clarified that no penalty would be levied under section 76 but confirmed the penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Appropriation of Deposited Amount:
The Tribunal ordered the appropriation of the amount deposited by the appellant towards the undisputed service tax and a penalty of 25% of the service tax demand. The Tribunal addressed the appellant's concern regarding the direction of appropriation towards penalty under section 78 only and confirmed the penalty imposed under section 77, while waiving the pre-deposit requirement due to the appeal's disposition.

Penalty Sections:
The Tribunal clarified that no penalty would be imposed under section 76 but upheld the penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty under section 77 was rightly imposed and confirmed, ensuring that interest, if applicable, would become payable.

Pre-deposit Requirement:
Due to the Tribunal's decision and the manner in which the appeal was disposed, the requirement of pre-deposit was waived. The appeal and stay petition were both disposed of, partially allowing the appeal based on the Tribunal's findings and directions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates