Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (11) TMI 533 - AT - Central ExciseCenvat credit on air travel service alleged that no nexus with the manufacture and the appellants have not produced evidence to show that these services were used for the business purpose - Held that - Appellants have produced a Chartered Accountant s certificate wherein it has been certified that the expenditure on Air Travel has been booked as Revenue expenditure and related to the final products and the cost of services have been included in the assessable value - In the case of Dr. Reddy s Lab Limited (2009 (9) TMI 287 - CESTAT, BANGALORE ) it was held that credit of service tax paid on input or Air Travel service is eligible. In view of above, the appeal is allowed.
Issues:
Cenvat credit denial for air travel expenses. Analysis: The judgment pertains to the denial of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 27,125 availed by the appellants for air travels from January 2006 to March 2009, with an additional penalty imposed equal to the credit amount. The issue revolves around the nexus of the air travel service with the manufacturing process and the business purpose. The appellants presented a Chartered Accountant's certificate certifying that the air travel expenditure was booked as revenue expenditure related to final products, with the cost of services included in the assessable value. The Tribunal found the certificate sufficient, considering the complexities involved in proving the specific purpose of each travel, especially in the context of business-related travels reimbursed by the industry. The judgment also referenced a High Court decision indicating that the restriction of place of removal applies to Goods Transport Agency services, not air travel services. Moreover, a previous Tribunal decision confirmed the eligibility of Cenvat credit for service tax paid on air travel services, further supporting the appellants' case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the adequacy of the Chartered Accountant's certificate in establishing the link between air travel expenses and business operations. This judgment highlights the importance of providing appropriate documentation to support Cenvat credit claims, especially in cases involving services like air travel. The Tribunal's consideration of the complexities in proving the business purpose of each travel underscores the practical challenges faced by businesses in such situations. By referencing relevant legal precedents, including a High Court decision and a previous Tribunal ruling, the judgment establishes a legal basis for allowing the appeal and recognizing the validity of the Chartered Accountant's certificate as sufficient evidence. Overall, the decision provides clarity on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for air travel expenses and emphasizes the significance of proper documentation and professional certification in substantiating such claims before the authorities.
|