Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2012 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (12) TMI 630 - AT - Income Tax


Issues involved:
1. Disposal of cross appeals for Assessment Year 2005-06 filed by the assessee and the Revenue.
2. Capitalization of interest and service charges incurred for acquisition of shares.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Disposal of cross appeals
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT CUTTACK addressed cross appeals for the Assessment Year 2005-06 filed by the assessee and the Revenue arising from the order of the CIT(A). The Tribunal decided to dispose of both appeals simultaneously for convenience as different issues were raised by each party. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of the assessee on the same issue. The Tribunal found no new material presented by the Revenue to challenge the previous decision, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Capitalization of interest and service charges
The primary issue raised by the assessee was the refusal by the CIT(A) to capitalize interest and service charges amounting to a specific sum incurred for the acquisition of shares. The assessee argued that these expenses should be treated as capital expenditure based on general accounting principles and accounting standards. The Tribunal reviewed the facts, including the investment in shares of NTPC Ltd. through Kotak Mahindra Investment, and the subsequent sale of shares. The Assessing Officer had added a differential amount to the assessee's income based on the cost of acquisition per share. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, considering the nature of the expenses as revenue in nature. However, the Tribunal disagreed with this approach, stating that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was an imaginary figure with no basis in the books of account. The Tribunal highlighted that the expenses incurred through the Portfolio Manager for share acquisition should be considered capital expenditure attributable to the cost of acquisition. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the enhanced addition made by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the capitalization of interest and service charges, emphasizing the distinction between capital and revenue expenditures in the context of share acquisition. The judgment provided clarity on the treatment of expenses related to asset acquisition and their impact on income computation, ensuring adherence to accounting principles and tax regulations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates