9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: The judgment involves two main issues: 1. Whether interest on a loan advanced to a company should be considered part of the assessee's income for tax assessment. 2. Whether interest forgone by the company can be treated as a business expenditure for the assessee.
Issue 1 - Interest on Loan: The Tribunal initially held that interest on a loan advanced by the assessee to a company was not part of the assessee's real income and thus not taxable. The Income-tax Officer disagreed, citing the accrual of interest based on the mercantile system of accounting and the Morvi Industries Ltd. case. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's argument that interest was forgone due to commercial expediency, supported by the Hindusthan Motors Ltd. case. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the commercial expediency aspect and dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Issue 2 - Interest Forgone: The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that interest was given up based on commercial expediency, as supported by the financial condition of the company to which the loan was advanced. The Division Bench referred to the James Finlay and Co. case, highlighting the importance of the timing of interest accrual and giving up. The judgment distinguished the Gappumal Kanhaiyalal case, where interest had accrued before being given up, unlike in the present case where interest was forgone within the relevant accounting year itself. Consequently, both questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded. This judgment clarifies the treatment of interest income on loans and the criteria for considering interest forgone as a business expenditure, emphasizing the significance of commercial expediency and the timing of interest accrual and relinquishment.
|
