Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2013 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (3) TMI 342 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of Brass Brazing Granules under Central Excise duty exemption notification.

Analysis:
The case involved a Proprietorship firm manufacturing Brass Brazing Granules and brass ingots. The firm claimed full exemption from Central Excise duty under Notification No. 8/98-C.E. and its successor notifications. However, after an inquiry in August 2001, it was determined that the goods manufactured were correctly classifiable under sub-heading 7403.21 as Copper Zinc Base Alloys (brass), not covered by the Small Scale Industry (SSI) exemption. A show cause notice was issued for duty demand, interest, and penalties. The Joint Commissioner confirmed the duty demand and imposed penalties. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty demand for brass ingots but dropped the demand for Brass Brazing Granules, classifying them as "other articles of copper" under sub-heading 7419.99 and eligible for SSI exemption.

The Revenue appealed against dropping the duty demand for Brass Brazing Granules, arguing that they should be classified under sub-heading 7403.21 as unwrought copper alloys. The Respondent defended the classification under sub-heading 7419.99, stating that the granules are ready-to-use articles for jointing metals. The Tribunal considered the submissions and examined the nature of the Brass Brazing Granules, which are made by pouring molten brass in cold water for brazing and welding purposes. The Tribunal concluded that the granules, being in the nature of unwrought metal, should be classified under 7403.21 as copper zinc base alloys (brass), not under 7419.99. Since the granules were not covered by the SSI exemption, the duty demand was upheld. The Tribunal also noted the firm's failure to obtain Central Excise registration or pay duty, allowing the extended recovery period under Section 11A(1) for duty collection. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the original Adjudicating Authority's decision was restored. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the cross objection by the Respondent was disposed of.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment clarified the correct classification of Brass Brazing Granules for Central Excise duty purposes, emphasizing their nature as unwrought metal under sub-heading 7403.21. The decision highlighted the importance of complying with registration and duty payment requirements, allowing for extended recovery periods in cases of non-compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates