1990 (2) TMI 11 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Income-tax Officer on account of undervaluation of closing stock of tea.

Analysis:
The High Court of Calcutta addressed the question of law referred by the Tribunal regarding the deletion of an addition of Rs. 11,49,000 made by the Income-tax Officer on account of undervaluation of closing stock of tea. The assessment year in question was 1978-79, with the relevant previous year being the calendar year 1977. The dispute arose from a change in the method of valuation of closing stock, as reported by the auditors of the assessee-company. The auditors noted that the stock of tea had been valued at garden cost or estimated realizable value, resulting in a lower value compared to the previous method of valuation. The Income-tax Officer alleged that the change in accounting method was not bona fide and was done to suppress profits. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) disagreed, stating that the assessee had adopted the proper method of valuation. The Tribunal found the change to be bona fide and consistent with the assessee's valuation practices in subsequent years, similar to another case involving Rajgarh Tea Co. Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to delete the addition of Rs. 11,49,000.

The High Court emphasized that the question of whether the change in the accounting method was bona fide or not is a factual inquiry. Since the Tribunal found the change to be bona fide and consistent with the assessee's valuation practices, the findings of fact were not challenged. The Court, therefore, answered the question of law in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee. The judgment was a unanimous decision, with both Judges concurring. The Court made no order as to costs, concluding the matter.

This judgment highlights the importance of assessing the bona fide nature of changes in accounting methods and the significance of consistent valuation practices in determining the legitimacy of adjustments to financial statements.