9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Disallowance of claimed loss for the assessment year 1972-73. Analysis: The case involves an individual assesses to income tax for the assessment year 1972-73, where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disallowed a claimed loss of Rs. 1,25,000. The assesses was intercepted by Central Excise authorities while travelling alone in his car, which led to the seizure of crockery articles and negotiable instruments. The assesses provided conflicting explanations regarding the ownership and acquisition of the seized goods. The Foreign Exchange Enforcement authorities confiscated the crockery and car, while the negotiable instruments were handed over to them. The income-tax authorities added the value of the seized goods as "unexplained investment" under "other sources". The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to estimate the value of seized goods but limited it to Rs. 1,25,000. The assesses contended that since the amount was seized by the Foreign Exchange Enforcement authorities, he should be allowed to deduct it as a loss. However, the Tribunal rejected this plea stating that there was no evidence to prove that the goods were permanently lost during the accounting period. The Tribunal emphasized that the assesses failed to provide satisfactory explanations for the source of acquisition of the goods, leading to the inclusion of the amount as income. The Tribunal held that the assesses cannot claim the value of the confiscated goods as a loss, as there was no proof of permanent loss during the relevant accounting period. Therefore, the High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to disallow the claimed loss of Rs. 1,25,000 for the assessment year 1972-73. The Court answered the question of law in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal was justified in its decision. The judgment will be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action.
|
