Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1990 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1990 (5) TMI 10 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Disallowance of interest on borrowed money used for interest-free advance
2. Deduction of excise duty on single filament yarn
3. Deduction of excise duty liability on crimped stretch texturised yarn
4. Relief on charity collections not constituting trading receipts
5. Sole selling agency commission deduction
6. Disallowance under section 80VV limits
7. Expenditure on bringing the late chairman's body for burial
8. Relief under section 80J for unit 'B'

Analysis:
1. The Revenue sought a reference on the disallowance of interest on borrowed money utilized for interest-free advance. The court directed the question to be stated as it was identical to a previous case.
2. The deduction of disputed excise duty on single filament yarn was rejected for reference by the court, following a previous decision.
3. The deduction of excise duty liability on crimped stretch texturised yarn was also rejected for reference based on a previous court order.
4. Relief on charity collections not constituting trading receipts was allowed by the Tribunal, and the court directed the question to be stated for opinion.
5. The deduction of sole selling agency commission was allowed by the Tribunal, and the court rejected the question for reference.
6. The disallowance under section 80VV limits was rejected as the amount was not spent in connection with proceedings under the Act, and the question was accordingly rejected.
7. The expenditure on bringing the late chairman's body for burial was considered justified by the court, and the question was not directed to be stated.
8. The relief under section 80J for unit 'B' was rejected for reference by the court based on a previous decision.
Overall, the Income-tax Application was allowed only for question No. 1 and rejected for the other questions, with the Tribunal directed to state question No. 1 for the court's opinion under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates