9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the applicability of section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to an advance or loan made to a corporate entity and whether the provision applies to the credit balance in the books of the assessee. Details of the Judgment: The reference pertains to the assessment year 1969-70, where the assessee, a private limited company, held shares in a subsidiary company, Harshad Textiles Mills Pvt. Ltd. The subsidiary had accumulated profits, and the assessee was a creditor of Harshad. The Income-tax Officer treated the accumulated profits as dividend in the assessee's hands under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the credit balance with Harshad was a result of day-to-day transactions and should not fall under section 2(22)(e). The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal rejected this contention. The provision of section 2(22)(e) includes any payment by a company to a shareholder, being a person with substantial interest, by way of advance or loan, to the extent of accumulated profits. The argument that the provision applies only to individuals was dismissed as the term "person" includes a company under the Act. The court held that the provision covers the case of an advance or loan to a shareholder with substantial interest in the company. The second question was answered affirmatively based on precedent. Both questions were answered in favor of the Revenue, and the assessee was directed to pay the costs of the reference.
|
