9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 7(1) and 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 regarding deduction of capital gains tax in valuing properties for wealth tax assessment. Analysis: The case involved eight references made under section 27 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, regarding the deduction of liability for capital gains tax in valuing the assessee's properties for wealth tax assessment. The question referred for opinion was whether the assessee was entitled to deduct capital gains tax liability in valuing properties under section 7(1) and computing net wealth under section 2(m) for the assessment year 1963-64. The Wealth-tax Officer reopened the assessment and determined the value of immovable properties as per section 7(1) without allowing deduction for capital gains tax. The Tribunal upheld this decision, leading to the reference for opinion by the assessee (paragraph 1). The assessee argued that the valuation of assets under section 7(1) should consider the liability to pay capital gains tax in the event of sale, citing a Delhi High Court judgment. The Supreme Court's decision in a similar case was also relied upon to support the deduction of liabilities in asset valuation. However, the Revenue contended that a Supreme Court judgment in another case established that expenses like brokerage or commission payable on sale were not deductible in asset valuation under section 7(1). A Madras High Court judgment was also cited to support the position that no hypothetical expenditure, including capital gains tax, should be deducted in determining asset value (paragraphs 2-3). The court examined section 7(1) of the Act, which mandates valuing assets based on the price they would fetch if sold in the open market on the valuation date. The court concluded that the language of the section did not allow for the deduction of capital gains tax in asset valuation. It emphasized that the section focuses on the price the asset would fetch on the valuation date, without considering deductions like capital gains tax. The court aligned with the Madras High Court's view that no hypothetical expenditure, including capital gains tax, should be deducted in determining asset value under section 7 of the Act (paragraph 4). In the final ruling, the court answered the question referred in the affirmative and against the assessee, indicating that the deduction of capital gains tax in valuing properties for wealth tax assessment was not permissible under section 7(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (paragraph 5).
|
