Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1990 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1990 (6) TMI 58 - HC - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Applicability of Payment of Bonus Act to goodwill bonus paid to employees and managing director.
2. Allowability of goodwill bonus as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act.
3. Deductibility of bonus paid in excess of the minimum under the Payment of Bonus Act.

Analysis:
1. The High Court of Kerala dealt with two income-tax reference cases involving the applicability of the Payment of Bonus Act to goodwill bonuses paid by the assessee to its employees and managing director. In the first case (Income-tax Reference No. 143 of 1987), the Tribunal held that the Payment of Bonus Act did not apply to the contractual bonuses paid. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the deduction based on an agreement to avoid labor unrest. The Appellate Tribunal further allowed the deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, citing business expediency. The court emphasized that bonuses exceeding the Act's limits could be deductible under specific conditions outlined in section 36(1)(ii) of the Act, which were not followed in this case.

2. In the second case (Income-tax Reference No. 147 of 1987), the Tribunal justified the deduction of excess bonus payments as customary bonuses outside the Payment of Bonus Act's scope. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision, which was affirmed by the Appellate Tribunal. However, the court reiterated that deductions for bonuses exceeding statutory limits must adhere to the conditions specified in section 36(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The court highlighted the importance of following these conditions, as established in previous judgments, to claim such deductions.

3. The court emphasized that the Appellate Tribunal failed to apply the law correctly and overlooked the requirements of section 36(1)(ii) in both cases. Consequently, the court declined to answer the questions referred but directed the Tribunal to reconsider the appeals in line with the law and the court's observations. The court also granted the Tribunal the discretion to remit the matter to the Income-tax Officer if necessary for further examination. The references were disposed of accordingly, with instructions to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates