Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2013 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (10) TMI 335 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
Approval of Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act 1956.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Filing of Joint Petition under Sections 391 and 394
The petitioners filed a joint petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation among the Transferor companies and the Transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act 1956.

2. Jurisdiction and Details of Petitioner Companies
The registered offices of the Petitioner companies were located within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, falling under the jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court. Details regarding the incorporation dates and capital structure of the Petitioner companies were provided in the petition.

3. Submission of Relevant Documents
The petition included copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association, as well as the latest audited annual accounts for the Petitioner companies. Resolutions passed by the Boards of Directors of the Petitioner companies approving the Scheme were also submitted.

4. Dispensation of Shareholders and Creditors Meetings
Earlier, the Court dispensed with the requirements of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors of the Petitioner companies. Meetings of creditors were held, and reports confirming unanimous approval of the proposed Scheme were submitted to the Court.

5. Notice and Compliance
Following the filing of the present petition, notices were issued to the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator. Citations were published in newspapers, and compliance regarding service and publication was demonstrated by the Petitioner companies.

6. Reports by Official Liquidator and Regional Director
The Official Liquidator reported no complaints against the proposed Scheme and found no prejudicial conduct in the affairs of the Transferor companies. The Regional Director raised an objection regarding the alteration of Memorandum and Articles of Association, which was resolved by an undertaking from the Transferee company.

7. Absence of Objections
No objections were received from any other party regarding the Scheme. Confirmation was provided that no objections were received from the public after the publication of citations in newspapers.

8. Grant of Sanction
Considering the approval by shareholders and creditors, along with the reports filed by the Regional Director and the Official Liquidator, the Court granted sanction to the Scheme under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act 1956.

9. Implementation of Scheme
The order directed the filing of a certified copy with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It outlined the transfer of undertakings, properties, rights, and liabilities to the Transferee company, leading to the dissolution of the Transferor companies.

10. Clarification and Voluntary Deposit
The order clarified that it did not exempt from stamp duty or taxes and required compliance with all legal requirements. The Petitioner companies agreed to deposit a sum with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator voluntarily.

11. Final Decision
The petition was allowed, and the order was directed to be given dasti.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates