Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (4) TMI 678 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
Interpretation of sub-section (3) of section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Whether the term 'business' in Section 80HHC(3) refers to all businesses of an assessee or only to the business involved in export activities.

Analysis:
The case involves M/s Itarsi Oil and Flour Mills, Raipur, for the assessment year 1993-94, focusing on the calculation of deductions under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The Assessee operates two units: a solvent extraction plant (SE-Unit) engaged in both export and domestic business, and a flour mill (F-Unit) exclusively involved in domestic business.

The crux of the matter is the interpretation of section 80HHC(3) formula for deduction calculation: Profit of the business * Export turnover / Total turnover of the business. The Assessee calculated the deduction considering only the SE-Unit's figures, excluding the F-Unit, while the Assessing Officer included profits from both units.

The dispute led to appeals and ultimately to the High Court. Two key questions were referred: whether the deduction calculation should be based on the profits and turnover of the export-oriented unit alone, or all businesses of the Assessee; and whether the term 'business' in section 80HHC(3) refers only to export activities or encompasses all businesses.

The High Court analyzed the legislative intent behind section 80HHC, emphasizing that the term 'business' in this context includes all activities carried out by the Assessee, not limited to export-oriented units. The Court referred to conflicting decisions from various High Courts but aligned with the Karnataka High Court's interpretation, ruling in favor of the Department.

The Court highlighted that the use of the term 'total turnover' in section 80HHC(3) indicates a broader scope, encompassing all businesses conducted by the Assessee. It rejected the Assessee's argument for a restricted interpretation based on the relief for export business, emphasizing the legislative language and intent.

In conclusion, the High Court answered both questions in the negative, supporting the Department's stance that 'business' in section 80HHC(3) includes all businesses and is not limited to export-oriented activities. The judgment clarifies the calculation methodology for deductions under section 80HHC, emphasizing a comprehensive approach considering all business operations of the Assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates