9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deduction claimed by an assessee for profits derived from export of goods. Details of the judgment: The High Court of Madras heard a tax case appeal concerning an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal related to the assessment year 1997-98. The appellant, the Revenue, challenged the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80HHC for export sales of jewellery and precious stones. The Assessing Officer had restricted the deduction, but the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal, which was further upheld by the Tribunal. The Revenue raised the question of law regarding the applicability of section 80HHC(3) to the assessee's case. The court referred to the provisions of section 80HHC, specifically clause (b) of sub-section (3), which outlines the calculation of profits derived from export of trading goods. Citing a previous decision, the court emphasized the importance of maintaining separate accounts for export and domestic sales to support the claim for deduction under section 80HHC. In this case, the court noted that the assessee had maintained separate accounts for export sales, demonstrating no intermingling of funds or expenditure with other business activities. The assessee had also submitted Form No. 10CCA to support the claim for deduction. Based on these findings, the court concluded that there was no error in the Tribunal's order and dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. Therefore, the court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate accounts and complying with legal requirements to support claims for deductions under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
|
