9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses two main issues: 1. Whether revenue expenditure incurred by the assessee for new divisions is deductible as business expenditure. 2. Whether technical assistance fees paid by the assessee for setting up new divisions are deductible. Issue 1: Revenue Expenditure for New Divisions: The court referred to a previous decision involving the same assessee and concluded that the revenue expenditure for new divisions is deductible as business expenditure. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the deduction for engineering and technical assistance fees related to the previous year, stating that it qualifies as revenue expenditure. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that since the business activity remains the same, there is no need to treat the new divisions as a separate business. Therefore, the deduction for revenue expenditure was allowed. Issue 2: Deductibility of Technical Assistance Fees: The Income-tax Officer initially disallowed the technical assistance fees deduction, citing that production had not commenced during the previous year. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the deduction, considering the technical assistance fees as part of the revenue expenditure. The court did not rely on previous judgments regarding technical know-how and instead focused on the fact that the new units were a continuation of the existing business. As a result, the deduction for technical assistance fees was also allowed in favor of the assessee. This judgment clarifies that revenue expenditure for new divisions and technical assistance fees paid for setting up new divisions are deductible as business expenditure, as long as the activities are considered a continuation of the existing business. The court emphasized that the commencement of production in the previous year is not a determining factor for allowing such deductions.
|
