9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (4) TMI 747 - HC - Income TaxEligibility to claim deduction u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act Purpose not solely Educational Interpretation of the term other than education Held that - Any income received by any person on behalf of the educational institution existing solely for educational purpose and not for purposes of profit and if its aggregate annual receipts do not exceed the amount of annual receipts as may be prescribed, it is entitled for exemption under this provision The society has been conducting the primary and secondary school in the State of Karnataka since 2002 - Nor is there any dispute that save and except for conducting school, the society has carried on any other activities since then - Without expressing any opinion whether the object, as reflected in Clause 3(b) and 3(h) of the Memorandum of Association, are related to education, it is clear that save and except educational activity the assessee did not/do not carry on any other activity is the fact, which is not in dispute - though the activities as reflected in Clause 3(b) and 3(h), may constitute the purpose, other than the educational purpose, but, during the relevant assessment year, it is not the case of the revenue nor is there any material to show, that the society was running any activities other than the educational activity. There are adequate safeguards that if the activities other than educational activities are undertaken by the society, exemption granted can be withdrawn - Merely, because there exists object, which is not related to educational activities, is not sufficient to deny the exemption/benefit of Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act - in the absence of any allegation or material against the society showing that they are involved in any other activities than the educational activities, it cannot be denied exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) Decided in favour of Assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the appellant-Society is not existing solely for educational purposes due to certain clauses in their memorandum of objects. 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the clauses in the Memorandum of objects are not connected with education, thereby disqualifying the appellant from claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Justification of Tribunal's Decision on Sole Educational Purpose The appellant-Society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960, runs a school named Geetanjali Vidyalaya and claims exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Society's income was assessed for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08, but the Assessing Officer determined the Society's total income, denying the exemption on the grounds that the Society included objects in its Memorandum not connected with education. The Appellate Authority initially allowed the exemption, but the Appellate Tribunal reversed this decision, stating that the Society's objects included non-educational purposes. The High Court noted that the Society is engaged solely in imparting education and has no other activities. The Court emphasized that the existence of objects unrelated to education in the Memorandum does not automatically disqualify the Society from exemption if it does not actually engage in those activities. The Court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institution v. Central Board of Direct Taxes, which stressed the need to analyze the actual activities of the institution, not just the objects in the Memorandum. Issue 2: Connection of Clauses in Memorandum with Educational Purpose The Tribunal held that clauses 3(b) and 3(h) in the Society's Memorandum, which pertain to establishing social institutions and implementing welfare programs, are not connected with education. However, the High Court pointed out that the Society has not engaged in any activities other than running the school. The Court cited the Allahabad High Court's judgment in C P Vidya Niketan Inter College Shikshan Society v. Union of India, which held that a society running an educational institution should not be denied exemption merely because it has objects unrelated to education if it does not engage in those activities. The High Court concluded that the Tribunal's view was incorrect as there was no evidence of the Society engaging in non-educational activities. The Court emphasized that the mere existence of unrelated objects in the Memorandum is insufficient to deny the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The Court also noted that there are safeguards in place to withdraw the exemption if the Society undertakes non-educational activities in the future. Conclusion: The High Court set aside the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the appellant-Society. The Court held that the Society is entitled to the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it solely engaged in educational activities during the relevant assessment years. The appeals were disposed of, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.
|
