Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2014 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (7) TMI 1080 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
Waiver of predeposit of service tax and penalty under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Analysis:
The case involved an application seeking waiver of predeposit of a substantial amount of service tax and penalties imposed on the Applicant. The Applicant was engaged by a company for conversion of raw materials on a job work basis. The Department alleged non-payment of service tax on services rendered by the Applicant as a "Marketing and Consignment Agent." The Applicant contended that they had not received any amount except for conversion charges and freight charges. The Department claimed that the Applicant had received service charges for post-removal activities, which included marketing services, and should have paid service tax under the category of "Business Support Services."

Upon examination, it was found that the Applicant had entered into agreements with the company for providing post-removal services, but the Applicant maintained that they had not received any service charges beyond conversion charges and reimbursement of freight charges. The Tribunal noted that the Department failed to provide evidence that the freight amount reimbursed was for services other than transporting goods. The Tribunal held that the Applicant had not received any service charges in addition to conversion and freight charges for post-removal activities. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the Applicant had made a prima facie case for a total waiver of the dues adjudged. As a result, all dues were waived, and recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeals. The stay petition was allowed, and the judgment was pronounced in open court.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates