9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: The judgment involves issues related to the validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147(a) and u/s 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the tax liability on capital gains received by the assessee.
Reopening of Assessment u/s 147(a): The assessee relinquished his rights in land without disclosing capital gains in his returns. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the assessment was not liable to be reopened under u/s 147(a) as full disclosure was made. However, the Tribunal upheld the reopening as relevant facts were not disclosed, leading to the levy on the sum of Rs. 65,000. The Tribunal also found that Rs. 75,417 received by the assessee was not taxable under section 45. Disclosure of Relevant Facts: The assessee argued that full disclosure was made before the assessment was completed, citing permission obtained under section 230A for releasing his interest in the property. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not produce documents related to section 230A during the assessment proceedings, indicating non-disclosure of crucial information regarding the relinquishment. Decision and Rulings: The Court answered question No. (1) in favor of the Revenue, stating that the reopening of the assessment u/s 147(a) was justified due to non-disclosure of crucial facts. Questions (2) and (3) were deemed irrelevant based on this decision. Question No. (4) was answered in favor of the assessee, citing a Supreme Court decision. Question No. (5) was answered in favor of the Revenue, confirming the tax liability on capital gains from the land transaction. Costs and Directions: The parties were directed to bear their respective costs in the tax referred cases. A copy of the judgment was to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.
|
