9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of provisions under section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding cash reimbursement of medical expenses and tax paid by employees, as well as deductions under sections 80L and 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Interpretation of Section 40(a)(v): The court considered whether cash reimbursement of medical expenses and tax paid by employees constituted a perquisite under section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court referred to previous decisions and held that a cash payment to an employee does not fall within the scope of the provision, emphasizing the words "whether convertible into money or not." The court rejected the argument to reconsider the previous judgment and ruled in favor of the assessee based on the interpretation of the relevant provision. Deductions under Sections 80L and 80M: The court examined the deductions under sections 80L and 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It noted the assessee's losses for the relevant assessment years and the deductions claimed under these sections. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the deductions, relying on previous judgments. However, the court held that the deductions should not be granted due to the assessee's negative income in the relevant years, in line with the provisions of Chapter VI-A. The court rejected the argument that the deduction under section 80M should be made directly from dividend income, emphasizing that deductions under Chapter VI-A are to be allowed from the assessee's gross total income. Summary: The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of section 40(a)(v) concerning cash reimbursement of medical expenses and tax paid by employees. However, the deductions under sections 80L and 80M were denied due to the assessee's negative income in the relevant assessment years. The judgment provides clarity on the application of these provisions in the context of income tax assessments.
|
