9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of circulars on amortization of film production costs, applicability of Circular No. 30 dated October 4, 1969, versus Circular No. 92 dated September 18, 1972 in assessment year 1973-74. Detailed Analysis: The case involved a firm engaged in film distribution and production, specifically concerning the write-off of the entire cost of production of a film released in the accounting year. The Income-tax Officer disallowed a portion of the write-off based on Board Circulars related to amortization of film production costs. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner supported the assessee's contention, leading to an appeal by the Revenue to the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal, citing precedents and Circulars, upheld the assessee's claim, stating that the revised Circular No. 92 dated September 18, 1972, did not apply to the assessment year 1973-74. The Tribunal emphasized that the relevant circular should be determined based on the assessment year, not the accounting year. The Central Board of Direct Taxes had issued Circulars providing guidelines for amortization of film production costs. Circular No. 30 dated October 4, 1969, allowed producers to write off the entire cost of a film in the year of release, while Circular No. 92 dated September 18, 1972, categorized films based on production costs and prescribed different amortization rules. The crucial question was which circular governed the assessee's case. The High Court referenced a previous decision emphasizing that the circular in force during the assessment year should be applied for deductions under the Income-tax Act, supporting the application of Circular No. 92 to the assessment year in question, 1973-74. The High Court concluded that Circular No. 92 dated September 18, 1972, was applicable to the assessment year 1973-74, and the Tribunal's decision favoring the assessee was incorrect. Following the principle that the circular in force at the beginning of the assessment year should apply, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, directing the Tribunal to act accordingly. The judgment highlighted the importance of aligning circular applicability with the assessment year rather than the accounting year, ensuring consistency in tax treatment and deductions related to film production costs.
|
