Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 632 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Substantial question of law regarding the treatment of Non Performing Assets (NPAs) under section 36(viia) and section 115JB.
2. Whether the provisions for NPAs and investment depreciation should be added back while computing book profit for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT).
3. Invocation of section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in relation to depreciation of investment.
4. Applicability of section 115JB to nationalized banks and the correctness of financial reporting by such banks.

Analysis:

1. The High Court admitted the appeal based on a substantial question of law related to the treatment of NPAs under section 36(viia) and section 115JB. The question raised was whether the provision for NPAs amounting to a specific sum should be added back to the net profit for the purpose of calculating the book profit under section 115JB(2). This issue was considered significant and admitted for further examination.

2. Another substantial question of law was raised regarding the treatment of both NPAs and investment depreciation in computing book profit for MAT. The Tribunal had opined on this matter, stating that the Commissioner's invocation of section 263 for depreciation of investment was not justified. The Tribunal had already added back the amount related to investment depreciation to the Assessee's income, and the powers of revision under section 263 were deemed unnecessary in this context.

3. The Court discussed the applicability of section 115JB to nationalized banks, particularly in relation to the Commissioner's invocation of section 263. It was observed that the Department's claim that section 115JB applies to nationalized banks like Dena Bank was not straightforward and required further scrutiny. The Court expressed doubts about the Commissioner's decision to invoke section 263 without proper satisfaction regarding its application to nationalized banks.

4. Ultimately, the Court refused to entertain the question related to the applicability of section 115JB to nationalized banks, as it did not consider it a substantial question of law. The appeal was dismissed on this specific issue. The Court emphasized the need for proper examination and satisfaction before invoking provisions like section 263, especially in the context of nationalized banks and their financial reporting practices.

5. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment highlighted the importance of addressing substantial questions of law related to tax provisions, such as the treatment of NPAs, investment depreciation, and the applicability of specific sections to entities like nationalized banks. The Court's decision to dismiss the appeal on certain grounds underscored the significance of thorough analysis and proper application of legal provisions in tax matters.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates