Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (1) TMI 1085 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. for manufacturing of DPC wires, strips, and power distribution transformers
- Increase in regular employment by more than 25%
- Location of units in the Industrial area specified in the notification

Analysis:
1. Exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E.: The respondents claimed exemption under this notification for manufacturing goods chargeable to Central Excise duty. The Asstt. Commissioner initially rejected their claim citing missing base employment figure and Khasra Number details. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) overturned this decision, stating that the certificates confirmed the required increase in regular employment and the units' location fell within the specified industrial area. The Tribunal upheld this decision based on the evidence presented.

2. Increase in regular employment: The Departmental Representative argued that the certificates were vague and did not mention the base employment figure. In response, the respondent's counsel provided detailed information showing a significant increase in regular employment due to additional investment in plant and machinery. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the respondent satisfactory, confirming the required increase in regular employment by more than 25%.

3. Location of units in the Industrial area: The Department raised concerns about the Khasra Numbers not matching those specified in the notification. The respondent clarified that the units' location fell under the Gangyal Private Land Industrial Area, supported by the Assistant Commissioner's confirmation. The Tribunal noted that the units' Khasra Numbers were within the specified industrial area mentioned in the notification, leading to the denial of the benefit of exemption being deemed incorrect.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, finding no fault in the impugned orders. The decision was based on the satisfactory evidence of increased regular employment, compliance with the industrial area location specified in the notification, and the overall fulfillment of the conditions for exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates