9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 5(1)(xxiii) of the Wealth-tax Act 1957 regarding exemption for a trust holding shares of Indian companies. Detailed Analysis: The case involved the interpretation of section 5(1)(xxiii) of the Wealth-tax Act 1957 regarding the exemption of Rs. 1,50,000 claimed by an assessee-trust on shares of Indian companies held by it for the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1975-76. The Wealth-tax Officer denied the exemption, stating it is only applicable to individuals and Hindu undivided families, not trusts. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed and directed the exemption. The Tribunal upheld the decision, considering the trust as an individual entitled to the exemption under section 5(1)(xxiii) of the Act. The court examined the relevant provisions of the Act, including sections 3, 4, 5, and 21A. Section 5(1)(xxiii) provides exemption for individuals or Hindu undivided families holding shares in Indian companies. The court noted the absence of any prohibition against trusts being considered as individuals under this section. The court also referred to past judgments, such as Suhashini Karuri v. WTO and Abhay L. Khatau v. CWT, which held that joint trustees can be treated as individuals for taxation purposes. In Trustees of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust v. CIT, the Supreme Court affirmed that trustees of a trust constitute an assessable unit under the Act, and the term "individual" in section 3 includes trustees. The court also considered section 21A, which allows wealth-tax to be levied on trustees as if they were individuals. Based on these principles and precedents, the court concluded that the exemption under section 5(1)(xxiii) is available to the assessee-trust, deeming it an individual entitled to the exemption. Therefore, the court answered the question in favor of the assessee-trust, affirming the Tribunal's decision. No costs were awarded, and a copy of the order was to be sent to the Tribunal as per the Act's requirements.
|
