9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Interpretation of rule 7 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 regarding deduction of transport expenses for sugarcane utilized in own factory.
Detailed Analysis: The case involved an assessee, a sugar mill company, claiming deduction for transport expenses incurred in bringing sugarcane from its farms to the factory gate. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the deduction, stating that the market price of sugarcane at the factory gate had already been debited. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision, emphasizing that transport expenses were not allowable under rule 7 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, as they pertained to agricultural activity, not business. On further appeal, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal allowed a partial deduction, considering the difference between the price fixed at the factory gate and the price fixed for out-centers. The Tribunal directed the reduction of disallowance on transport expenses to this difference, acknowledging the assessee's argument regarding the out-centers' pricing. The High Court, in its judgment, analyzed rule 7 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, which governs deductions for partially agricultural income used in business. The Revenue contended that transport expenses were not deductible under this rule. However, the Court referred to a precedent from the Andhra Pradesh High Court, which held that transport charges for bringing sugarcane to the factory were deductible as they related to the business of the assessee. The High Court concurred with the Andhra Pradesh High Court's interpretation, stating that transport charges beyond what was included in the ex-factory gate price were allowable deductions. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's decision to permit the deduction of actual transport charges incurred by the assessee. Consequently, the Court answered the question in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision and rejecting the Revenue's argument. In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction of transport expenses beyond the ex-factory gate price under rule 7 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The Court emphasized that such expenses were related to the business activity of the assessee and were therefore allowable as deductions. The judgment was delivered by Judges Dipak Kumar Sen and Paritosh K. Mukherjee in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.
|
