Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 1245 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounting to Rs. 2.55 crores, personal penalty of Rs. 20.00 lakhs imposed on an individual, allegations of clandestine removal of MS ingots without duty payment, deposit of Rs. 10.00 lakhs during adjudication, closure of factory affecting income, offer to deposit additional Rs. 10.00 lakhs, direction for further deposit within eight weeks, consequences of failure to comply.

The judgment concerns applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty by M/s. Atlanta Commodities and a personal penalty imposed on an individual for alleged clandestine removal of MS ingots without duty payment from March 2006 to September 2007. The issue revolves around the evidence presented by both sides, crucial for the appeal's disposal. The appellant's representative highlighted the factory's closure for 2-3 years, resulting in minimal income, but offered to deposit Rs. 10.00 lakhs at this stage.

The Revenue's representative reiterated the Commissioner's findings during the proceedings. The tribunal noted that Rs. 10.00 lakhs had already been deposited and the appellant offered to deposit an additional Rs. 10.00 lakhs, which was deemed sufficient to proceed with the appeals. Consequently, M/s. Atlanta Commodities was directed to deposit Rs. 10.00 lakhs within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon this deposit, the pre-deposit of the remaining dues against M/s. Atlanta Commodities and the entire penalty on the individual would be waived, with recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply with the deposit directive would lead to the dismissal of both appeals without further notice.

The judgment was pronounced and dictated in open court by Dr. D.M. Misra, one of the presiding judges.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates