9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of the definition of "capital asset" u/s 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74.
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan was tasked with determining whether gold ornaments and jewellery were to be considered capital assets only from April 1, 1973, and not prior to it, thus affecting the capital gains tax liability for the assessment year 1973-74. The case involved an individual assessee who had sold gold ornaments during the relevant accounting year for Rs. 33,426, with the gold ornaments being sold for Rs. 40,300. The Income-tax Officer contended that jewellery articles fell within the definition of "asset" from April 1, 1973, resulting in a capital gains tax liability of Rs. 13,560. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and subsequently the Tribunal held that since the sale occurred before April 1, 1973, no capital gains tax was payable. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the sale of gold ornaments took place before the amendment that classified them as capital assets from April 1, 1973. The Court highlighted the non-retrospective nature of the Finance Act of 1972 and affirmed that substantive rights accrued to the assessee before April 1, 1973, could not be taken away. Consequently, it was concluded that no capital gain accrued to the assessee from the sale of gold ornaments and jewellery during the relevant previous year. In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that the gold ornaments and jewellery only became capital assets from April 1, 1973, thereby absolving the assessee of any capital gains tax liability for the assessment year 1973-74.
|
