Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2016 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (1) TMI 809 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether income chargeable to tax under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act is to be excluded under clause (baa) of the Explanation to Section 80 HHC of the Act for the purposes of computing the deduction allowable to the assessee under that section.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Income Chargeable to Tax under Section 41(1) and its Exclusion under Clause (baa) of Explanation to Section 80 HHC:

The case revolves around the interpretation of Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act, specifically whether income deemed under Section 41(1) should be excluded under clause (baa) of the Explanation to Section 80 HHC for computing deductions. The assessee received a waiver of interest amounting to Rs. 2,24,46,466/- from Punjab National Bank, which was offered as income under Section 41(1) and claimed as a deduction under Section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) held that 90% of this deemed income had to be reduced from the profits of the business as it was not derived from exports.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the A.O.'s decision, referencing the Supreme Court judgments in CIT vs. Sterling Foods and Pandian Chemicals vs. CIT, which emphasized that such income was not derived from exports. However, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal, leading to the current appeal by the Revenue.

The key legal question admitted was whether income chargeable under Section 41(1) should be excluded under clause (baa) for computing the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Revenue argued that the ITAT misconstrued the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. K. Ravindranathan Nair, which held that independent incomes like incentive profits should be excluded from business profits for Section 80HHC purposes.

The court reviewed Section 80HHC and its Explanation (baa), which defines "profits of the business" as profits computed under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" reduced by 90% of receipts like brokerage, commission, interest, rent, etc., which are independent incomes with no nexus to export turnover.

The court analyzed precedents, including K. Ravindranathan Nair, which clarified that independent incomes not derived from export activities should be excluded from business profits under clause (baa). The court also considered other judgments, such as Shri Ram Honda Power Equip and ACG Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd., which emphasized the exclusion of independent incomes from business profits for Section 80HHC purposes.

The court concluded that the income chargeable under Section 41(1) is independent and not derived from export activities, thus 90% of such income should be excluded from business profits under clause (baa). However, the court also noted that if the liability incurred by the assessee for interest was previously allowed as a deduction, it would not change its nature and become independent income. Therefore, only the net interest included in business profits should be considered for exclusion under clause (baa).

Conclusion:

The court answered the question by clarifying that while computing interest under clause (baa), the Assessing Officer should consider the net interest (gross interest reduced by expenditure incurred for earning such interest). The appeal was dismissed with this clarification, and parties were to bear their own costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates