Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2016 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (1) TMI 997 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues: Challenging distraint order under TNVAT Act for assessment year 2014-15 without passing assessment order.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Challenging the distraint order
The petitioner challenged a distraint order issued by the respondent under the TNVAT Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The petitioner, a registered dealer, filed its return and responded to a notice calling for objections regarding purchases from registration-cancelled dealers. The respondent neither accepted nor rejected the petitioner's reply but issued the distraint order for recovery without passing any assessment order for the year.

Issue 2: Legal Arguments
The petitioner's counsel argued that the respondent's actions were arbitrary and against natural justice. They contended that the notice calling for objections was issued after the assessment year had ended, and the distraint order was unjustified. The petitioner had also made tax payments for certain months via demand drafts, which could be adjusted against the balance tax.

Issue 3: Respondent's Submission
The Additional Government Pleader for the respondent acknowledged that a provisional assessment order had been passed but not served on the petitioner yet.

Judgment and Analysis
The court noted that the provisional assessment order had been passed but not served on the petitioner. Consequently, the court deemed the respondent's action of issuing the distraint order for tax recovery unjustified. The court directed the Assessing Officer to pass a comprehensive assessment order for the entire year 2014-15, following due procedure under the Act. The court set aside the distraint order and instructed the respondent to pass a lawful assessment order within eight weeks, affording the petitioner a fair opportunity for a personal hearing.

This judgment highlights the importance of following due process and natural justice principles in tax recovery matters under the TNVAT Act. It emphasizes the necessity for proper assessment orders before resorting to distraint actions and ensures that taxpayers are given a fair chance to respond and rectify any tax discrepancies.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates