9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Whether the income of the assessee was exempt under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1964-65 to 1969-70. Analysis: The judgment of the court, delivered by Justice Kapur, pertained to the exemption of income under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the years 1964-65 to 1969-70. The assessee in question was an association of persons established as a society under the Societies Registration Act, 1960. The corpus of the trust came from the World Agriculture Fair organized by Bharat Krishak Samaj, and its income source was a building in Connaught Place, New Delhi. The trust deed outlined various charitable objects, including education, scholarships, and support for agricultural initiatives. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) had identified two objects as non-charitable, related to financing projects by Bharat Krishak Samaj and campaigns for freedom from hunger. However, the court found that both these objects were charitable or of public utility, aligning with the definition in section 2(15) of the Act. Regarding the first object of financing projects by Bharat Krishak Samaj, the court noted that Bharat Krishak Samaj had been previously recognized as a charitable organization by the court. Referring to a previous judgment, the court emphasized that activities aimed at the protection and advancement of agricultural producers were considered matters of public utility. Therefore, the court concluded that this object was charitable. Similarly, concerning the second object related to campaigns for freedom from hunger, the court deemed it to be of manifest public utility, falling within the definition of charitable purposes under the Act. The appellate authorities, including the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, had previously ruled in favor of the assessee, following the precedent set by the judgment on Bharat Krishak Samaj. Consequently, the court affirmed that the assessee's income was indeed exempt under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Despite the question referring to the exemption of any portion of income, the court determined that the entire income of the assessee was exempt. The parties were directed to bear their own costs, and the judgment was delivered in favor of the assessee, based on the charitable nature of the trust's objects and activities.
|
