9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The appeal challenges the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(A) regarding the disallowance of expenses u/s 14A of the IT Act and Rule 8D for AY 2008-09. Issue 1: Disallowance u/s 14A of the IT Act The assessee contested the disallowance of &8377; 4,58,112 u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 r/w Rule 8D, arguing that no expenditure was incurred for earning tax-free income. Citing the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi, the assessee emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to provide cogent reasons for rejecting the claim regarding expenditure related to exempt income. The AR highlighted that share application money should be excluded under Rule 8D as it does not yield tax-free income. The AR also referenced legal precedents to support the contention that certain expenses, such as interest on loans, should not be disallowed under section 14A. Issue 2: Judicial Review of Disallowance The ITAT observed that the Assessing Officer did not properly consider the legal principles and judgments cited by the assessee. Referring to the decision in the case of Maxopp Industries Ltd., the ITAT emphasized the requirement for the AO to be unsatisfied with the correctness of the claim before determining the expenditure related to exempt income. The ITAT noted that the share application money in the balance sheet did not generate tax-free income and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the issue in line with the legal precedents and provide the assessee with a fair hearing. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeal and directed a reassessment by the Assessing Officer. This judgment highlights the importance of following legal principles and providing a reasoned basis for disallowing expenses related to exempt income under section 14A of the IT Act.
|
