9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Reference u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the applicability of section 40A(3) and Rule 6 DD on cash payments made by the assessee.
Summary: 1. The Revenue raised a reference u/s 256(1) of the Act, 1961 questioning the Tribunal's decision on the deductibility of cash payments totaling to Rs. 50,23,905 made by the assessee, contending that they were not in compliance with section 40A(3) and Rule 6 DD. 2. The assessee, a trader in grains, faced allegations of making non-genuine payments to a supplier. The Assessing Officer (AO) found discrepancies in the purchase transactions and disallowed the payments under section 40A(3) as they were not made through cross cheques/drafts and did not meet the criteria of Rule 6DD. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reversed the AO's decision, stating that the purchases were genuine and duly accounted for in the books of accounts. The CIT (A) found no evidence to disprove the genuineness of the transactions, hence deleting the disallowance. 4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, emphasizing that the cash payments were made under exceptional circumstances falling within the purview of Rule 6DD, thus justifying the deletion of the addition. 5. Referring to the Supreme Court's interpretation of section 40A(3), the Court affirmed that payments for stock-in-trade are covered under 'expenditure' and can be disallowed if made in cash exceeding specified limits, in line with Rule 6DD. 6. Previous decisions by High Courts established that where genuineness of payments is not doubted, no question of law arises regarding the applicability of section 40A(3). The settled position was reiterated in the present case, affirming the Tribunal's decision. 7. The Court concluded that the question of law raised in the reference was well settled and answered in the affirmative, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the deductibility of the cash payments made by the assessee.
|
