9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Challenge of demands for Service tax by appellants. 2. Determination of whether appellants acted as Consignment Agent or Commission Agent. 3. Granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. Analysis: Issue 1: Challenge of demands for Service tax by appellants The judgment addresses three separate appeals challenging demands for Service tax. The appellants in Appeal Nos. S/54/2005 and S/55/2005 contest demands of Rs. 32,057 and Rs. 2,39,547 respectively for specific periods. In Appeal No. S/56/2005, a demand of Rs. 21,70,505 for a different period is disputed. The appellants are seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the tax and penalty amounts. Issue 2: Determination of whether appellants acted as Consignment Agent or Commission Agent The Tribunal identifies a common issue across the cases - whether the appellants operated as Consignment Agents or Commission Agents during the relevant periods. The case of M/s. LNGS Pvt. Ltd. is distinguished as they functioned as Commission Agents, covered under "Business Auxiliary Services" introduced post 1-7-2003. A prima facie case is established against the Service tax demand for M/s. LNGS Pvt. Ltd., leading to the grant of waiver and stay of recovery. Issue 3: Granting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery For the other two appellants, M/s. Sri Vasavi Jeans and M/s. Sabarey Enterprises, who were physically handling excisable goods and acting as Consignment Agents, the Tribunal finds no prima facie case against the Service tax demands. Therefore, they are directed to pre-deposit the respective tax amounts within six weeks and report compliance by a specified date. In conclusion, the judgment clarifies the distinction between Commission Agents and Consignment Agents in determining the applicability of Service tax demands. While waiver is granted in one case, pre-deposit is directed in the other two cases based on the nature of services provided by the appellants during the disputed periods.
|
