Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + AAR VAT and Sales Tax - 2016 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (10) TMI 1230 - AAR - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Tax liability on the sale of imported goods from a customs bonded warehouse.
2. Tax implications of ex-bond sales to duty-free shops.
3. Applicant's liability to discharge tax on the aforementioned transactions.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Tax Liability on Sale of Imported Goods from a Customs Bonded Warehouse:
The applicant queried whether the sale of imported goods from a customs bonded warehouse to license holders is liable to tax under the MVAT Act. The judgment concluded that such sales are indeed liable to tax as per the relevant schedule entry under the MVAT Act. The rationale is that the goods stored in a bonded warehouse, declared under section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962, do not qualify as being within a "customs station" defined under section 7 of the same Act. Therefore, these goods are considered to have crossed the customs frontiers, making the sale taxable within the state of Maharashtra.

2. Tax Implications of Ex-bond Sales to Duty-Free Shops:
The applicant posed an academic question regarding whether ex-bond sales of imported goods to duty-free shops constitute a 'sale in the course of imports' and are thus exempt from MVAT. The judgment clarified that such sales are neither in the course of import nor export and are therefore taxable under the MVAT Act. The court emphasized that the bonded warehouse in question is not a customs station under section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962, and thus the goods are considered to have crossed the customs frontiers. Additionally, the sale to duty-free shops does not meet the criteria for export, as there is no foreign destination for the goods.

3. Applicant's Liability to Discharge Tax:
The applicant inquired about their liability to discharge tax on the aforementioned transactions. The judgment confirmed that the applicant is liable to tax as per the schedule entry D-3 appended to the MVAT Act, 2002. The applicant does not hold any license under the State Excise Act (Prohibition Act), which further solidifies their tax liability under the MVAT Act.

Conclusion:
The judgment concluded that:
- Sales of imported goods from a customs bonded warehouse are taxable under the MVAT Act.
- Ex-bond sales to duty-free shops are neither in the course of import nor export and are taxable under the MVAT Act.
- The applicant is liable to discharge tax on these transactions as per the relevant schedule entry under the MVAT Act.

The judgment emphasized that the specific provisions of the CST Act and the Customs Act should not be conflated, and the definitions provided in each act must be adhered to strictly. The judgment also referenced several Supreme Court rulings to support its conclusions, ensuring that the interpretation aligns with established legal precedents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates