Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2018 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (7) TMI 1920 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Central Excise Valuation Rules contravention, Recovery of duty, Disallowance of CENVAT credit, Interest payment, Penalty imposition.

Central Excise Valuation Rules Contravention: The Respondent cleared cut-pieces of wires & cables as waste & scrap, leading to a Show Cause Notice alleging violations of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Adjudicating Authority imposed Central Excise duty, education cess, disallowed CENVAT credit, and ordered interest payment and penalty under relevant provisions. The Lower Appellate Authority set aside certain demands but upheld others, leading to an appeal before the Tribunal by the Revenue.

Recovery of Duty: The Adjudicating Authority ordered the recovery of Central Excise duty, education cess, and disallowed CENVAT credit from the Respondent for contraventions of various rules. The Lower Appellate Authority set aside some demands but upheld others, leading to a mixed outcome in terms of duty recovery. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision in the Respondent's case to uphold the impugned order, rejecting the appeal filed by the Revenue.

Interest Payment: The Adjudicating Authority ordered the payment of interest at the appropriate rate by the Respondent for the violations in accordance with the relevant provisions. The Lower Appellate Authority upheld the interest payment on confirmed demands. The Tribunal sustained the decision on interest payment, as per the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal.

Penalty Imposition: The Adjudicating Authority imposed a penalty equivalent to the recoverable amounts on the Respondent under Section 11AC of the Act. The Lower Appellate Authority reduced the quantum of penalty imposed. The Tribunal upheld the modified penalty amount, reducing it to a specific sum, in line with the decision on the impugned order, and rejected the Revenue's appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal based on the decision in the Respondent's own case and the interpretation of waste and scrap of wires and cables as not falling under the relevant tariff heading. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the Lower Appellate Authority's decision, sustaining the order and rejecting the Revenue's appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates