9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Determination of whether income derived from letting out 'Vinayaka Lodge' should be assessed as business income or income from property.
Summary: The assessee, engaged in the grocery business, constructed a building with 68 rooms known as "Vinayaka Lodge" and let out the rooms furnished with amenities for varying durations. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initially assessed the income as property income, but the Appellate Tribunal later determined it to be business income considering factors such as the number of rooms, amenities provided, and commercial nature of the activity. The Commissioner argued that the income should be treated as property income since the assessee was merely earning surplus income from the property. However, the Tribunal's decision was upheld based on the commercial features of the activity, including the provision of various amenities and the absence of permanent tenants with tenancy rights. In the absence of any specific legal precedent, the court emphasized that each case must be decided based on its unique facts. The commercial nature of the activity was highlighted by the individual letting of rooms, provision of amenities like cot, table, chair, attached bath-rooms, hot and cold water, room service, and telephone facility. These features indicated that the lodge was operated on a commercial basis rather than merely as a property owner. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that the income derived from 'Vinayaka Lodge' should be assessed as business income.
|
