2012 (12) TMI 1194 - HC - Income Tax

Addition on Account of 'On Money' Receipts - Assessee had canvassed that not the entire 'on money' received but only the profit element could be taxed in the hands of the assessee. Assessee had suggested addition of 10% - HELD THAT -The additions are limited to 15% of the 'on money' receipts.

Summary

Issues:
1. Assessment basis - July to June vs. financial year basis
2. Taxation on cash receipts estimation
3. Charging of interest under Section 139 and 215
4. Taxation of income from construction business
5. Deduction for expenses incurred for vacating occupants
6. Jurisdiction of action and order under section 147
7. Addition under sections 68, 69, and 69A in the year of search

Analysis:

1. The primary issue in this case revolved around the assessment basis, specifically whether the assessment of the assessee should be done on a July to June basis instead of a financial year basis. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT (A) in this regard. However, the High Court noted that the central issue pertained to additions sustained by the Tribunal at the rate of 15% of the 'on money' received by the assessee. The Tribunal limited the additions to 15% of the 'on money' receipts, which was a substantial acceptance of the assessee's contention that only the profit element should be taxed.

2. Regarding the taxation of cash receipts estimation, the Tribunal upheld the observation of the CIT (A) by estimating the cash receipts from the cellar and ground floor at specific amounts. The High Court did not find it necessary to further examine this issue as the assessee's contentions were substantially accepted by the Tribunal.

3. The Tribunal's decision to charge interest under Section 139 and 215 was also challenged. The High Court noted that the assessee's sole contention before the Tribunal was substantially accepted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as there was no purpose in further pursuing the matter.

4. The issue of taxing the income from the construction business was raised, particularly in relation to the calculation of income based on cash and cheque receipts. The Tribunal's decision to tax a specific amount as income from the construction business was upheld by the High Court.

5. The deduction of expenses amounting to Rs. 32 lakhs incurred for vacating occupants from the land on which the building was constructed was also disputed. However, the High Court did not find merit in this argument and did not allow the deduction.

6. The jurisdiction of action and order under section 147 was questioned, but the High Court did not find any reason to overturn the Tribunal's decision in this regard.

7. Lastly, the addition under sections 68, 69, and 69A in the year of search was contested. The High Court confirmed the Tribunal's decision that such additions should be made in the year of search if it cannot be held that they are related to a specific assessment year.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal as the assessee's central contentions were substantially accepted by the Tribunal, and further examination was deemed unnecessary.