Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2019 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (11) TMI 1539 - HC - Customs


Issues:
1. Challenge to the legality of communication directing information submission and inspection.
2. Allocation and storage of Red Sanders wood by petitioner.
3. Export regulations and procedures under CITES and Indian authorities.
4. Delay in issuing Certificate of Origin and inspection of stock.
5. Discrepancy in permissions for exporting Red Sanders wood as logs or Value Added Products.

Issue 1:
The petitioner challenged a communication from the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Telangana, directing the submission of information in a prescribed proforma, arranging wood logs for inspection, and providing copies of transit permits. The petitioner contended that the communication was illegal.

Issue 2:
The petitioner, engaged in purchasing Red Sanders (RS) from auctions and exporting it, stored allotted stock in Toopranpet Village, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District. The petitioner claimed to have a valid license under the Telangana Red Sanders Wood Possession Rules, 1989.

Issue 3:
The petitioner highlighted regulations governing RS export under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and procedures set by the Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, for obtaining export authorization.

Issue 4:
The delay in issuing the Certificate of Origin by the Forest Department despite repeated requests was a crucial concern. The petitioner emphasized the necessity of inspection before the certificate could be issued, as per Ministry of Environment guidelines.

Issue 5:
The dispute arose regarding the form in which RS could be exported, whether as logs or Value Added Products (VAP). The petitioner argued that this decision fell under the purview of the Central Government, not the State Forest Departments of Telangana or Andhra Pradesh.

The judgment directed the inspection of the petitioner's stock by Andhra Pradesh Forest Department officers to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Origin. The Court mandated a hearing for the petitioner before deciding on the certificate's issuance, ensuring compliance by both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh authorities by a specified deadline. The judgment resolved the petitioner's challenges and disposed of the writ petition with no costs awarded.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates