Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2020 (1) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (1) TMI 1385 - AAR - GST


Issues involved:
1. Classification of laboratory reagents under GST Tariff.
2. Interpretation of Schedule II and Schedule III of CGST Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Analysis:
1. The applicant, engaged in importing and supplying laboratory reagents, sought a ruling on whether laboratory reagents fall under Tariff Heading 38220090 or as "Goods which are not specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI." The applicant argued that laboratory reagents are specifically covered under Tariff Heading 3822 and should be classified accordingly.
2. The applicant referenced the HSN classification, Customs Tariff Act, and GST notifications to support their claim. They highlighted that the Customs Appraising Department's interpretation was incorrect and that the specific description in Schedule II should prevail over the general description in Schedule III.
3. The applicant also pointed out an anomaly in the GST classification compared to the HSN classification, emphasizing changes made by the GST council and the intention behind such changes to include all items of Tariff Heading 3822 in Schedule II.
4. After reviewing the submissions and documents, the Authority determined that the term "All diagnostic kits and reagents" in Schedule II does not cover laboratory reagents. They differentiated between diagnostic and laboratory reagents, concluding that laboratory reagents imported and supplied by the applicant do not fall under the specified category.
5. The ruling stated that laboratory reagents are classified as "Goods which are not specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI" under Schedule III of the CGST Notification, contradicting the applicant's classification argument. The decision was made based on the interpretation of the specific language used in the notifications.

Overall, the judgment clarified the classification of laboratory reagents under the GST Tariff, emphasizing the importance of specific descriptions and interpretations of the relevant schedules in the notifications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates