Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1982 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1982 (1) TMI 39 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the issue of the justification of the Income Tax Officer's order reopening the assessment under clause (a) of section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Details of the Judgment:

Reopening of Assessment:
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal referred the question of law regarding the justification of the assessment reopening to the High Court. The assessee had disclosed the construction details of a residential house but later, the Income Tax Officer issued a notice for reassessment based on the valuation report from the departmental valuation cell. The assessee's explanation was deemed unsatisfactory by the Income Tax Officer, leading to reassessment orders. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) held that the proceedings under section 147(a) were not valid as the primary facts disclosed by the assessee were full and true. The Tribunal remanded the case back to the AAC, which led the assessee to seek a reference to the High Court.

Disclosure of Material Facts:
The Tribunal observed that any information obtained by the Income Tax Officer could justify reopening the assessment under section 147(b) if income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal proceeded with the case under section 147(a) and questioned whether the assessee had fully and truly disclosed all material facts necessary for assessment. The AAC's findings indicated that the assessee had provided detailed information about the construction and investment, which was not found false by the Income Tax Officer. The High Court concluded that the conditions for invoking section 147(a) were not met as the income did not escape assessment due to the assessee's failure to disclose material facts.

Conclusion:
The High Court held that the reassessment orders were liable to be quashed as the Income Tax Officer did not have jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 147(a). The Court's answer to the referred question was negative, ruling against the department. Each party was directed to bear their own costs in this reference.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates