Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2021 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (9) TMI 1389 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions of SARFAESI Act 2002 in relation to auction of property.
2. Requirement of registration of sale certificate under Section 17 of the Indian Registration Act.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a businessman, participated in a bank auction conducted under SARFAESI Act for a property. The auctioned property was declared NPA and sold to the petitioner. The petitioner was asked to register the sale certificate with the Registration Authority, which he challenged in the present petition.

2. The petitioner relied on a Supreme Court judgment which held that upon confirmation of sale in favor of the auction purchaser and issuance of a sale certificate, no further deed of transfer is required. The petitioner argued that based on this judgment, he should not be required to register the sale certificate under the Registration Act.

3. The State argued that as per Section 17 of the Registration Act, documents creating rights or interests over a certain value must be registered. However, the Court noted that Section 17(2)(xii) exempts certificates of sale granted to auction purchasers from mandatory registration under the Act.

4. The Court observed that the petitioner's case falls within the ambit of the Supreme Court judgment cited, and he should not be compelled to register the sale certificate as he acquired the property through an auction conducted under SARFAESI Act.

5. Section 17(2)(xii) specifically exempts sale certificates issued to auction purchasers from registration requirements. The Court reiterated the Supreme Court's interpretation that no further deed of transfer is needed once a sale certificate is issued to the auction purchaser confirming the sale and title.

6. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the directive to register the sale certificate, and directed the respondent-authority not to enforce the registration requirement. The Court held that the petitioner, having purchased the property through a SARFAESI Act auction, is protected by the provisions of Section 17(2)(xii) of the Registration Act, and the sale certificate does not need registration.

7. The judgment clarified that the respondent's action of requiring registration of the sale certificate was illegal and contrary to the law. The writ petition was allowed, and all related applications were disposed of, with any interim orders being vacated.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates