2021 (1) TMI 1298 - HC - Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 - denying the benefits of Section 11 and 12 by invoking proviso to Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) - accumulation of 15% - deduction in the fixed assets - HELD THAT - All the three questions referred to above as proposed by the Revenue are no longer res integra in view of the judgment of this High Court rendered 2020 (8) TMI 600 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT This tax appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of provisions related to Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Application of proviso to Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) of the Act.
3. Allowance of accumulation and deduction in fixed assets under Sections 11 and 12.

Analysis:
1. The High Court addressed the first issue concerning the interpretation of Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue raised questions challenging the findings of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer regarding the denial of benefits under Sections 11 and 12 by invoking the proviso to Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal's decision was questioned, and the Court referred to a previous judgment to establish the legal position on this matter. The Court found that the issues raised were no longer open to debate based on the precedent set by a previous judgment, thereby dismissing the tax appeal.

2. The second issue involved the application of the proviso to Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal's decision to allow the accumulation of a specific amount without considering the impact of Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) was challenged. The Court, however, relied on a previous judgment to conclude that the matter was settled and not open for further discussion. Consequently, the tax appeal was dismissed based on the established legal position.

3. The final issue revolved around the allowance of accumulation and deduction in fixed assets under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete the deduction in fixed assets without considering the implications of Section 2(15) r.w.s. 13(8) was contested. The Court, citing a previous judgment, determined that the issues raised were no longer debatable. As a result, the tax appeal failed, and the Court dismissed it in line with the established legal precedent.