2012 (12) TMI 1240 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening of assessments u/s 147 for assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07.
2. Eligibility of the assessee company to claim deduction u/s 80IA for assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2009-10.

Summary:

1. Validity of Reopening of Assessments u/s 147:
The assessee challenged the reopening of assessments for the years 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07, arguing that the original assessments u/s 143(3) were completed without any failure on their part to disclose material facts fully and truly. The assessee cited the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd., asserting that the reasons for reopening must be based on tangible material and not merely a change of opinion. The Revenue relied on judgments from the Allahabad High Court to justify the reopening based on excessive deductions granted u/s 80HHC. The Tribunal concluded that the reopening was not supported by any tangible material and was merely a change of opinion, thus holding that the income-escaping assessments completed u/s 147 for the three assessment years were bad in law and set aside those assessments.

2. Eligibility for Deduction u/s 80IA:
The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80IA for profits from its BOT project at Tuticorin Port, arguing that it met all conditions of section 80IA(4). The Assessing Officer initially denied the deduction, stating that the assessee was not a consortium of Indian companies and had not made sufficient investments. Upon review, the Tribunal found that the assessee, a company registered in India, owned the BOT project and had made significant investments. The Tribunal held that the assessee satisfied all conditions of section 80IA(4), including being a company registered in India and entering into a BOT agreement with the Tuticorin Port Trust. The Tribunal also noted the CBDT's earlier approval u/s 10(23G) supported the assessee's claim. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to redo the assessments, granting the deduction u/s 80IA for the relevant assessment years.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, both on the question of reopening of assessments u/s 147 and on the eligibility for deduction u/s 80IA. The orders were pronounced on December 6, 2012, in Chennai.