2007 (3) TMI 186 - HC - Income Tax

Return of income tax was filed after the due date AO is not justified to treat the income shown in the belated return is undisclosed income subject to tax as block assessment

Summary

Issues:
1. Whether income admitted in belated returns can be treated as undisclosed income for block assessment.
2. Validity of treating incomes admitted in belated returns as undisclosed income.
3. Interpretation of Section 158B(a) and Section 158BA(2) in relation to block period.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The case involved a dispute over whether the income admitted in belated returns can be considered undisclosed income for block assessment. The assessing officer treated incomes admitted in returns filed beyond the due date as undisclosed income for block assessment under Section 158BB(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that once the return of income was filed, even if belated, the information was available to the Department before the search date, hence not qualifying as undisclosed income.

Issue 2:
The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's argument against treating belatedly filed returns as undisclosed income for block assessment. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that the information contained in belated returns, though filed late, was valid and known to the Department before the search. The Tribunal's ruling was based on the premise that the mere act of filing belated returns does not automatically classify the disclosed income as undisclosed for block assessment purposes.

Issue 3:
The interpretation of Section 158B(a) and Section 158BA(2) was crucial in determining the treatment of undisclosed income for the block period. Section 158B(a) defines the block period, while Section 158BA(2) mandates that total undisclosed income for the block period is chargeable to tax at the specified rate, regardless of the specific previous years involved. The Court referenced a previous judgment to support the view that information disclosed in belated returns, even if filed after the due date, should not be automatically treated as undisclosed income for block assessment purposes.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, finding no legal question warranting further consideration. The judgment highlighted the distinction between belatedly filed returns and undisclosed income for block assessment, emphasizing that valid information disclosed in such returns should not be deemed undisclosed solely based on the timing of filing. The decision underscored the importance of assessing the substance of information provided by the assessee rather than focusing solely on procedural timelines.