2016 (6) TMI 932 - AT - Income Tax

Disallowance u/s 14A applying Rule 8D - non recording satisfaction that there is no expenditure disallowable u/s 14A as claimed by appellant in his return of income - Held that - On reading of the assessment, order we do not find that AO has recorded any satisfaction on the claim of the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred which is disallowable u/s 14A of the Act

Summary

Issues:
1. Disallowance of expenditure under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without recording satisfaction or relying on evidence.
2. Applicability of Rule 8D for disallowance of expenditure related to exempt income.

Issue 1: Disallowance of Expenditure under Section 14A:
The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the Assessing Officer erred in making the disallowance without recording any satisfaction or relying on the evidence of expenditure incurred. The contention was that no expenditure was incurred against the earning of exempted income, and all investments were made from the personal account of the appellant. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance based on the previous year's acceptance of such disallowance. However, the Tribunal held that the AO did not record any satisfaction on the claim of the assessee regarding the absence of disallowable expenditure, as required by law. Citing the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was unsustainable, and thus, the disallowance was deleted.

Issue 2: Applicability of Rule 8D for Disallowance of Expenditure:
The second ground of appeal revolved around the applicability of Rule 8D for the disallowance of expenditure related to exempt income. The assessee contended that Rule 8D was not applicable as the AO did not record any satisfaction about the correctness of the claim before invoking its provisions. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, referred to the provisions of Section 14A and Rule 8D. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer must first examine the disallowance made by the assessee or the claim of no expenditure incurred before resorting to Rule 8D. Since the AO did not satisfy this precondition, the Tribunal held that the disallowance under Rule 8D was unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the disallowance amount.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the importance of the AO recording satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D for disallowance of expenditure related to exempt income under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment emphasized the necessity of following legal procedures and ensuring proper assessment based on the law's requirements.