9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (5) TMI 267 - AT - Service TaxRoyalty received by appellant-Port Trust from IGTPL who rendered Port Services prima facie appellants have strong case as Royalty received is also forming a part of amount for which the service tax has been paid by M/s. IGTPL - With regard to levy of tax on rental amount received for renting out jetties Tribunal has always taken a stand that when a new service (Renting of immovable property) is introduced it would have prospective effect and not retrospective effect Stay is granted
Issues:
1. Whether the demand of service tax on 'Royalty' amounts to double taxation. 2. Whether the levy of service tax on renting out immovable properties for 'Port Services' is applicable for the relevant period. Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original demanding service tax on Royalty received by the appellants from a service agreement with M/s. India Gateway Terminal Pvt. Ltd. The appellants argued that the Royalty was a share of gross revenue earned by IGTPL on which service tax was already paid, thus constituting double taxation. They cited relevant case laws supporting their position. The Tribunal found that the appellants had a strong case, with the Royalty forming part of the amount already taxed by IGTPL. The Tribunal granted a full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery proceedings until the appeal was decided, noting the significant revenue involved. 2. The issue of service tax on rental income from 'jetties' owned by the appellants within the Port area under 'Port Services' was also considered. The appellants contended that the levy of service tax on renting out immovable properties was introduced only from 2007, making it non-taxable for the relevant period. The Tribunal acknowledged that the introduction of a new service category would have prospective, not retrospective, effect. Therefore, they granted a full waiver of pre-deposit for the rental income as well, staying all recovery proceedings until the appeal's final hearing scheduled for July 2008. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of these issues during the final hearing.
|
