Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2016 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (7) TMI 920 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding the treatment of interest income in the profits of a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking (EOU).
2. Application of Section 80HHC in determining deduction eligibility under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Consideration of fresh evidence under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

Analysis:

1. Interpretation of Section 10B:
The High Court analyzed the provisions of Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on subsections (1) and (4). Subsection (1) allows a deduction for profits derived by a 100% EOU from exports, subject to the provisions of the section. Subsection (4) specifies the method for calculating the deduction based on export turnover and total turnover. The Court emphasized that the deduction is dependent on the formula provided in subsection (4) and does not exclude interest income from the total turnover. The Court cited a Karnataka High Court judgment supporting the inclusion of interest income in the profits of the business of the undertaking for deduction under Section 10B.

2. Application of Section 80HHC:
The Court addressed the application of Section 80HHC in determining deduction eligibility. It highlighted that Section 80HHC excludes 90% of interest income for calculating deductions, but such provision is not present in Section 10B. The Court differentiated between the provisions of Section 10B and Section 80HHC, emphasizing that interest income must be considered in the profits of the business for a 100% EOU. It rejected the relevance of a Madras High Court judgment that did not consider Section 10B(4) in a similar context.

3. Consideration of Fresh Evidence:
The Court noted that one of the questions regarding the consideration of fresh evidence under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 was not pressed by the revenue. Therefore, the Court focused solely on the interpretation of Section 10B and did not delve into the issue of fresh evidence. The Court relied on precedents and the Tribunal's decision to uphold the treatment of interest income as part of the profits of the business of a 100% EOU eligible for deduction under Section 10B.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeal, answering the primary question against the revenue and in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of interest income in the profits of a 100% EOU under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the statutory provisions and relevant case law to support its decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates