Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2017 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (10) TMI 520 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Classification of imported goods under Chapter 61 or Chapter 62 based on composition and nature of the items.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the classification of readymade garments as "girl tight" under CTH 61152100 by the importer, while the Department argued for classification under CTH 62046990 as "gents trousers." A sample of the items was sent to the Textile Committee, which reported that the goods were made of synthetic fibers, leading to the Department's classification decision. The provisional assessment was finalized by the Assistant Commissioner, and on appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) approved the classification under Chapter 62.

The appellant contended that the classification under Chapter 62 based on the composition of the cloth was incorrect, emphasizing that composition is irrelevant for determining whether the item is tight or trouser, and argued for classification under Chapter 61. However, the Department justified the classification under Chapter 62, considering not only the composition but also the nature of the goods as woven, as confirmed by the importer.

After hearing both sides and examining the record, the Tribunal noted that the disputed goods were made of woven fabric, leading to the conclusion that the classification under Chapter 61 was not applicable. Chapter 61 covers knitted or crocheted apparel, while Chapter 62 applies to items not knitted or crocheted. Therefore, the classification under Chapter 62046990 was upheld, as the imported item was made of woven fabric, not knitted or crocheted.

Ultimately, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, which was upheld, and the appeal was rejected. The judgment was pronounced on 05.09.2017 by the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates