Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2018 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 57 - AT - Insolvency and BankruptcyProduction of the certificates on completion of the project - Violation of order of Moratorium - Insolvency Resolution Process - Held that - Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the handing over or showing any document to any party will not amount to violation of order of Moratorium . In view of such observation, learned counsel for the Resolution Professional sought permission to withdraw this appeal. Prayer is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues:
Appeal against order of Adjudicating Authority regarding production of certificates before Arbitral Tribunal during Corporate Insolvency Resolution process. Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Resolution Professional of a company against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority related to the production of certificates before an Arbitral Tribunal. The Arbitral Tribunal had directed the Applicant to produce certificates regarding completion of a project in a sealed cover. The Applicant argued that being under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution process, they couldn't file any application before a court as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, affecting their right of unpaid vendor lien. The Respondent contended that the Arbitral Tribunal's order was detailed and aimed at avoiding financial implications if the Corporate Debtor withheld the completion certificates. The Arbitral Tribunal suggested that any issue raised by the Applicant should be brought before the Arbitral Tribunal for consideration. Consequently, the Application was disposed of by the Arbitral Tribunal. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal heard arguments from the Insolvency Resolution Professional and the Respondent's counsel. It was opined that showing or handing over documents to any party would not violate the moratorium order. Subsequently, the Resolution Professional sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
|